🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.