🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary says the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.